Summary
The Climate Change Levy (CCL) package is the second biggest
element in the UK Climate Change Programme. The Government believes that
Climate Change Agreements (CCAs) will reduce annual CO2 emissions by an
additional 7 million tonnes by 2010. Savings appear to have been significant
but were strongly front-end loaded and have eased off since its
introduction.
This Report from the Environmental Audit Committee,
'Reducing Carbon Emissions from UK Business: The Role of the Climate Change
Levy and Agreements' (HC 354), examines the impact that these initiatives have
had on reducing carbon emissions from UK businesses.
The
Committee's findings include:
- The Levy will reduce annual UK carbon
dioxide (CO2) emissions by 12.8 million tonnes by 2010 - but these savings have
come mainly from the effect its announcement had on raising awareness of the
potential for energy savings and most of these savings were the result of
actions taken before the tax actually came into operation.
- The Levy
itself has had relatively little effect on business emissions, especially in
the case of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large but non-energy
intensive organisations.
- Complying with CCAs has galvanised business
interest in finding energy savings and the incentive of the tax discount that
they offer has been key to this.
- The exemptions on the CCL for 'green
electricity' and combined heat and power (CHP) have had minimal effect on the
construction of new renewables and CHP capacity, essentially because they are
worth too little money.
- The CCL package does not impose a damaging
economic burden on UK business overall and is encouraging greater resource
productivity and stimulating energy efficient industries.
The
Report concludes that the CCL has not worked quite as expected. Instead of
rationally seeking to reduce their costs through increased energy efficiency,
businesses appear to have needed an extra stimulus to change their approach to
energy use. This has profound implications for climate change policy more
widely; if even large companies require additional policies to drive
behavioural change, this must be all the more true for small businesses, public
bodies, and private households.
Found this story interesting?
Spread the news by clicking below to add it to your bookmarking
service: