Skip to content


Government should withdraw all NHS funded homeopathy urges inquiry

Summary

'Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy’ (HC 45) examines the Government's policies on the provision of homeopathy through the National Health Service (NHS) and the licensing of homeopathic products by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). This was prompted after a Government response in September 2009 indicated that scientific evidence was not used to formulate the licensing regime operated by the MHRA.

This inquiry is an examination of the evidence behind government policies on homeopathy, not an inquiry into homeopathy. The task was to determine whether scientific evidence supports government policies.

The Government acknowledges that there is no credible evidence of efficacy for homeopathy however this view has not translated into evidence-based policies. The Committee states that by providing homeopathy on the NHS and allowing MHRA licensing of products which subsequently appear on pharmacy shelves the Government runs the risk of endorsing homeopathy as efficacious.

The Committee concludes that homeopathy should not be funded on the NHS and the MHRA should stop licensing homeopathic products.

Found this story interesting?
Spread the news by clicking below to add it to your bookmarking service:

Law-Making Explained

This is a House of Commons paper (HC 45, 2009-10). It is a Report from the House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee.

Find out more about House of Commons papers.

How does it affect me?

This affects you if you are currently prescribed homeopathic remedies on the NHS. It will also be of interest to GPs who are currently offering homeopathic prescriptions.

Further Reading

Learn more about the homeopathy from the British Homeopathic Association

Visit the Society of Homeopaths website

Read more about the Science and Technology Committee


Find out how to have your say